beta
Text
1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won;
2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 24, 2017, the Defendant was mixed with “C” located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant was mixed with “C” on August 24, 2017.
D seeing that the Defendant was suffering from the Defendant, and the Defendant was shakings down several times above the Defendant’s sexual flag, and as D gets out of the watch, whether he gets out of the sandd position.
“” and in addition, the sexual organ was shakened, and continued to build a card with D for the settlement of payment, and was shaking the sexual organ below it.
In this respect, the Defendant openly committed an obscene act for about five minutes at a place where a large number of unspecified persons were located.
2. On August 26, 2017, around 09:10 on August 26, 2017, the Defendant entered the above place by reporting that D d her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her shes with a card affixed to D for the settlement of payments, and continued to her her she
The term "" and the sexual flag was marksed.
In this respect, the Defendant openly committed an obscene act for about five minutes at a place where a large number of unspecified persons were located.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. Application of CCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 245 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;
2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which increases concurrent crimes;
3. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order.
4. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.
5. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the crime of this case was committed against a witness who served in the store, and the nature of the crime was bad. However, the defendant appears to be against his will, such as when he misleads the witness, and the defendant does not have a previous record of a sex crime and has no previous record of a fine exceeding the fine, and goes out of clothes.