1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 30,000 and the Defendants B from October 26, 2014 to September 30, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Following the facts of recognition are: (a) the Plaintiff and Defendant B deemed to have led to confession pursuant to Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act; and (b) there is no dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) or may be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in each of the statements in subparagraphs 1-5, 1-5, 2, 1, and 2.

(1) On April 25, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant B for the lease of 506 U.S. Do Officetel 506 (hereinafter “instant partitioned building”) with the Busan-gu Busan-gu Office (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) by setting the deposit amount of KRW 60 million and the period of May 18, 2014 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”). The Plaintiff pays the deposit amount of KRW 60 million to C, while receiving delivery of the instant partitioned building from the Plaintiff, completed the move-in report on May 25, 2012, and received the fixed date under the instant lease contract.

(2) The instant partitioned building is 506 square meters on the public register, including the registry, and the size of the section for exclusive use is 44.46 square meters (public injury) and was owned by E at the time of the instant lease agreement.

However, the partitioned building of this case was marked as 505 on the entrance in the present situation.

(3) The above officetels No. 505 (hereinafter referred to as '505') can only be called

(1) The Plaintiff and the instant lease agreement was concluded with the Plaintiff as a property right exercise with the knowledge that the instant partitioned building was 505,000,000 square meters in its own possession, as separate sections on the same floor as the instant partitioned building. (4) While mediating the instant lease agreement, Defendant B knew that the instant partitioned building was 505, such as the indication of the present situation, and explained the legal relationship, etc. thereof to the Plaintiff. (The object of the instant lease agreement is also the object of the instant lease agreement.