1. The above cases concerning the compulsory auction and the auction of real estate in Suwon District Court A, B (combined) real estate and the auction of real estate;

. The distribution schedule was prepared to distribute the amount of KRW 2,346,454,783 to the Plaintiff, who is a mortgagee, and the amount of KRW 636,451,053 to the Defendant, who is the applicant creditor.

The details of dividends to the creditors in the second and third different buildings of this case are as follows.

The amount to be distributed to the creditors of the second and third priority: 4,474,056,446 won (the total amount of dividends on the building - the first priority dividend) after absorbing the amount of dividends distributed to the creditors of the distribution priority, the final amount of dividends 1,639,602,030 1,491,150,6103 Defendant Atetcck for defendant 10 billion won and 636,4536,451,05333 and 23,923,972,60,602,532,532,54646,47445,47564,467,47564,467,579,47565,47,967,4757,964,57,574,4753 (which shall be limited to 1,664,5675,7945,7,19465,7,367,36494,4,365

3) The Plaintiff appeared on the date of distribution and raised an objection against the whole amount of each distribution to be received by the Defendants from each of the instant buildings. [Grounds for recognition] Facts that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 10, 12, 13, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 13, 14, Eul evidence No. 14, and Eul evidence No. 1 (if there is a serial number, it includes those).

hereinafter the same shall apply.

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Determination on the claim

가. 원고의 주장 피고 아트테크의 이 사건 공정증서에 기한 채권은 강박에 의하여 발행된 약속어음에 기한 것이고, 그렇지 않더라도 피고 아트테크의 오쉘윈에 대한 채권은 대물변제로 소멸되었으므로 배당받을 권리가 없으며, 피고 대한민국은 이 사건 각 건물에 관하여 신탁이 이루어지기 전에 압류를 하지 아니하였으므로, 신탁 전의 소유자인 오쉘윈에...