Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 2008, the Plaintiff is a hardware or software that deals with issues related to WiFi Posing System (hereinafter “WPS”) fashion software failure or application program using the signal.
LBS (LBS Services) is a company that provides LBS operators with location-based technology, which is the core foundation of LBS, upon filing an application for development or patent.
The defendant is a company that produces maps necessary for internal recreation services using the outdoor maps based on the location coordinate provided by the location coordinate technology.
B. On May 31, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a WPS solution, and the Defendant concluded a business-based recreation termination note (hereinafter “this case’s MOP construction”), which is jointly promoted by providing, maintaining, and jointly promoting the business by providing, maintaining, and maintaining an indoor MAP construction, and indoor location-based applied services and solution.
The relevant contents of this case are as follows.
The defendant and the plaintiff establish a new business model by efficiently combining the highest capacity held by the two companies in the field of the provision of indoor location information-based services (hereinafter referred to as "business") and by discovering a new business model, and thereby concluding a business recreation hall as follows in order to promote win-win development and enhance the competitiveness of the company:
Article 2 (Contents of Mutual Cooperation) In relation to “business” jointly promoted by both companies, the following business shall be classified as a mutually strategic partner, and the matters not specified below shall be promoted under mutual cooperation:
1) With respect to “business” jointly promoted by the Defendant, the Defendant’s role is realized, provided, maintained, and repaired at its own expense the “actual MAP construction” and “actual MAP construction” of the subject building, and its ownership belongs to the Defendant. 2) In relation to the business jointly promoted by the Plaintiff’s role, the Plaintiff’s “establishment of WiFi AP Information” and “in-house identification.”