logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.08.25 2015가합52543
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 72,437,00 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from February 24, 2015 to August 25, 2016, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is a limited company established on February 15, 1990 with the main purpose of factory automation equipment, electronic equipment assembly business, machinery, equipment, and structure manufacturing and installation. The defendant is a local agricultural cooperative under Chapter II of the Agricultural Cooperatives Act established for the purpose of promoting agricultural productivity by its members. The non-party C Co., Ltd (hereinafter “C”) is a limited company established on January 26, 201 for the purpose of producing, processing, distributing, selling, and exporting oil according to the defendant’s investment.

B. On November 12, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted a written estimate for the production of a refrating machine and submitted a written estimate for the production of a refrating machine with the Defendant as KRW 132,737,000 (including value added tax) and entered into a contract for the production and installation of a refrating machine (hereinafter “contract for the installation of a refrating machine”) with the content that the contract amount is KRW 132,737,000 with the Defendant.

(2) The Plaintiff made a verbal conclusion in accordance with the instant contract for the construction of the oil reservoir, and completed the installation of the oil reservoir in early 2013, and received KRW 100 million out of the price from the Defendant.

3) The Defendant pointed out that the construction of the fruit is inferior at the stage of the operation of the instant reservoir construction, and then suggested other drying companies’ scamythy sampling and removal of building facilities. The Plaintiff demanded improvement of the building condition and removal of building facilities. The Plaintiff stated that additional costs would accrue for improvement of the building condition and removal of building facilities. 4) On September 18, 2014, according to the Defendant’s above request, the contract amount is KRW 39,700,000 (including value-added tax) with the Defendant as the contract amount of KRW 39,70,000 (including value-added tax).

arrow