Text
1. The part of the motion for departure of the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3...
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. 1) The plaintiff is the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China").
(2) On January 208, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for divorce, etc. against B by asserting that “B was unable to recover, by making a marriage report with B who is a national of the Republic of Korea on January 6, 2006, and entered the Republic of Korea on March 13, 2006, as the status of stay (F-2) (F-2).” On November 20, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for divorce, etc. with the former District Court 2008D7089, by asserting that “B, during the marriage period, made an unlawful act, such as telephone contact with C, which is the former wife, or a final maturity, etc., and that, as a result, the Plaintiff’s marriage with B was no longer broken down to the point of recovery.”
On December 30, 2008, the above court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation with the purport that "the plaintiff and B shall be divorced by mistake in the plaintiff and B," and the above ruling became final and conclusive on January 17, 2009.
3) The Plaintiff filed an application for naturalization on May 9, 2008, but received a non-permission decision on April 6, 2010 on the ground of lack of basic knowledge (Korean language ability, etc.) and the ability to maintain livelihood. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission to extend the period of stay on January 18, 2010, which was waiting to grant permission for naturalization. On April 13, 2010, the Plaintiff obtained permission to extend the period of stay for six months for domestic settlement of domestic affairs.
B. 1) On May 14, 2010, the Plaintiff reported a marriage with D who is a national of the Republic of Korea again, and obtained permission for extension of the period of stay on January 6, 2011, and thereafter stayed after obtaining permission for change of status of stay for marriage immigration (F-6). (2) On February 7, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for divorce against D as the Suwon District Court member 2013Ra658.
On September 25, 2013, the above court demanded D to the Plaintiff during the period of marriage to pay money several times as the funds for the Maren Project, and that D applied for naturalization for stable livelihood in the Republic of Korea, or did not return the money with a foreign registration certificate.