1. Defendant D’s KRW 60,000,000 to Plaintiff A, KRW 17,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 40,00,00 to Plaintiff C, and each of the above.

1. Claim against Defendant D

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment made by deeming the relevant provisions as private capital);

2. Claim against Defendant E

A. Plaintiff A’s claim 1) On November 11, 2013, Plaintiff A loaned KRW 30 million to Defendant D and E for the resolution of the school violence case of Plaintiff D and E. On November 11, 2013, Plaintiff A loaned the loan to the said Defendants at the end of February 2014.

B) On January 3, 2014, Defendant D and E jointly operated a H station around the loan, and Plaintiff D and E received a request from Defendant D and E to lend KRW 30 million with the funds for the operation of the station, and on January 3, 2014, the said Defendants leased KRW 30 million to the said Defendants 1% of interest per month and without the due date for payment agreement. Preliminaryly, Defendant E is jointly and severally liable to pay the funds borrowed from Defendant A as the primary claim from the Plaintiff under Article 24 of the Commercial Act. (2) According to each of the above statements of Articles 8-6 and 14, Defendant D and 14, the purpose of which was 0,000 won, including the above loans from the Plaintiff on November 11, 2013, Defendant 1 and 30, the Plaintiff 1 and 10,000 won were transferred to the Plaintiff E and 10,000 won for the purpose of resolving the money from the Plaintiff E and 10,000,00 won for the Defendant 1.