logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.09.07 2017고단923
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who drives a sports cargo vehicle in Dco in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the equivalent) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the non-accident after an accident).

On March 7, 2017, the Defendant promoted the intersection of the Fri-distance in front of Pyeongtaek-si E around 21:30, from the funeral funeral hall to the new ethic ethic ethic.

Since there is no signal signal, there was a duty of care to proceed with the driver of the motor vehicle as to whether there is another motor vehicle having access to the intersection by properly examining the front side and the left and right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went directly from a Masan airfield distance as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure, Masan-gu and entered the intersection, and H X-gu driving at the intersection by the victim G (Y, 59 years old). The chief part of the right-hand part of the vehicle was shocked with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to a victim due to the above occupational negligence for about three weeks, and at the same time, even if the damaged vehicle damaged property, such as the exchange of c,779,114 won in front of the damaged vehicle, and the damaged vehicle damaged property to cover KRW 4,720,00,000, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking necessary measures such as relief for the victim.

2. The Defendant also parked the Defendant’s vehicle in the air carrier adjacent to the station adjacent to the place where the traffic accident occurred by making phone call to I immediately after the Defendant caused the traffic accident as set forth in the above paragraph 1, and by having I know the occurrence of the traffic accident and leave the same place.

In order to conceal the driving of alcohol by the defendant at the above gas station near the above day, the defendant asked that the above I would be deemed to have driven and his consent was obtained.

In addition, the above I immediately.

arrow