1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is the owner of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 192 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) and the Plaintiff is the owner of a parcel and its ground building adjacent to the instant land (hereinafter “instant building”). The main part of the instant building is a building constructed on a part of the instant land.

B. The Defendant received a favorable judgment against the Plaintiff by filing a lawsuit seeking the removal of the part of the instant building constructed on the ground of the instant land and the transfer of the said part of the land (this Court Decision 2016Da147201, Apr. 26, 2018) and the said judgment became final and conclusive.

[Reasons for Recognition] The Evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 of Evidence No. 1

2. The plaintiff asserts to the purport that since the plaintiff has a right to demand the purchase of ground property against the defendant, it shall exercise such right and seek payment equivalent to the value of the building of this case.

However, there is no proof of assertion as to the grounds that such right to purchase exists, and the plaintiff's claim is without reason to examine it.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.