1. The part against the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) among the part concerning the counterclaim of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is as follows, and this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment. Thus, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The 5th judgment of the first instance court is the 9th "household" as the "Organization".

From 6th to 6th to 6th, the ground investigation report prepared as a result of the ground investigation conducted on June to 7, 2008 and the defendant's order made on April to 5, 2009 was provided."

Part 7 1 "At the time" shall be deemed to be " March 24, 2009", and 7 " at the bottom of the same side" shall be deemed to be " October 27, 2009".

The 6th class 6th class "Fman on January 2010" was "Fman on January 26, 2010," and the 7-8th class "Fman on January 26, 201," respectively, was "It was impossible to properly carry out construction works due to serious horizontal change as in the existing K, as in the case of the existing K."

Part 12 1 to 6 of the table "Notwithstanding the above 3-mentioned bidding conditions, N andO completed the maritime RDR construction using dependent diskettes.

"Ero-friendly".

2. Determination on the main claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion on this part of the Plaintiff’s claim is identical to the entry in Section 13-8-19 of the first instance court’s judgment, and thus, this part of the claim is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2) The facts acknowledged prior to the fact that the circumstances acknowledged in relation to the instability in Jackk-kack Business (where the causes attributable to the discontinuance of construction work are located), and the following facts are revealed in full view of the following: (a) Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6-16, 19, 29, 30, 31, 34, 49, 54, 54, 55, 66-69; (b) Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 20, 222, 25, 25, 41, and 444 (including evidence attached thereto).