logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.11.20 2015고단2898
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant of "2015 Highest 2898" is a person who runs a wholesale and retail business of livestock products under the trade name of "AB" in the AA building B-10 of Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

On May 3, 2011, the Defendant called “AC” with “AC” and called “AC” to the victim AD operating livestock products wholesale and retail business, and made a false statement that “on payment is to be made without a mold after a day, the Defendant first delivered goods and delivered them in order to do so.”

However, the fact is that there was no intention or ability to pay all the price of the goods even if the livestock products are supplied by the victim because there was a lot of obligation to pay the price of the goods to the existing business entity.

The Defendant was supplied from May 3, 201 to May 20, 201 by the victim with a total of KRW 177,911,83 on seven occasions from May 3, 201 to May 20, 201.

In addition, from July 23, 2010 to May 25, 2011, the Defendant received the supply of a total of KRW 516,576,662 from six victims, as described in the separate crime list, by the following methods.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property by deceiving victims.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 3114" is a person who runs a wholesale and retail business of livestock products under the trade name of AB, and works for the victim AE business division established for the purpose of wholesale and retail business of livestock products is between AB and AF who works for the victim AE business division as a member of the livestock products business in the past.

On November 8, 2010, the Defendant received a proposal to request the supply of livestock products from AF, a business employee of the victim.

However, the fact is that there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the goods even if the livestock products are supplied by the victim because there was no intention or ability to pay the price for the goods under the circumstances in which the amount of the goods has been paid to the existing business entity.

The defendant belongs to this.

arrow