1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 17, 2007, the Plaintiff was driving two lanes on the two-lane road in front of D in the direction of D located in C in the city of Won-si, the husband of which was the husband on March 17, 2007. The Plaintiff did not see the said car, but did not change the vehicle into one-lane and stop the vehicle, and did not cause contact, but caused the Plaintiff’s injury to the shoulder.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) B.

The defendant is the insurer of the above F vehicle.

C. On March 19, 2007, after the accident, the plaintiff was diagnosed by G Council members of G Council on the name of clinical presumption, that "the name of the post-face sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sye sty

On the other hand, on May 24, 2009, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Seoul National University Hospital, and was diagnosed as 'the Dognasium', 'the Dognasium', 'the Dognasium', 'the Dognasium', 'the Dognasium was performed on May 25, 2009, and discharged on May 28, 2009.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to 4-2, Gap evidence 6 and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the knital was caused by the accident of this case, and that the defendant, the insurer of the defendant's vehicle, sought a payment of the amount equivalent to the damage compensation amount, but the defendant asserts that the knital of the plaintiff did not have causation with the accident of this case.

B. The scarke, the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, and the above basic facts and evidence No. 2-1 to 3, A.