beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a real estate broker who has an office in the vicinity of the C Apartment located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and the Defendant purchased the above apartment house 104 Dong 703 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).
B. Around March 10, 2015, D, the owner of the instant apartment, requested a brokerage of the sale of the instant apartment at KRW 1.2 billion to the brokerage office and the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in the vicinity of the Plaintiff, for the disposal of the instant apartment.
C. The Defendant was residing in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul on a deposit amount of KRW 500 million, and was planned to set up a director before the expiration of the lease term, and asked G (a person working at the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office) (a person working at the H Licensed Real Estate Agent Office) who arranged the above lending to seek a deposit amount of KRW 700 million.
Around June 20, 2015, the defendant's denial I, through the J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, visited apartment units on the same different floors as the apartment units of this case, confirmed the internal structure, confirmed the situation of the apartment complex, and confirmed the situation of the apartment complex, etc., and if the lease deposit exceeds KRW 700 million expected, it was in a situation where the lease of the above apartment is to be obtained.
At this time, G gave advice to the Defendant to the effect that “it would not be improved to obtain a loan, as it is confirmed that there was an immediate sale of the relevant apartment rather than entering into a lease contract with a loan.”
(E brokerage office in the state where the apartment of this case was put to NAVs et al.). (e)
Accordingly, on June 25, 2015, the defendant department visited the apartment complex of this case and opened the surrounding area, and entered the plaintiff's office where a Madern was opened.
F. K, which had been at the time of the office, solicited the Defendant to purchase and sell the apartment of this case of KRW 1.16 million, and agreed in advance to visit the apartment of this case at the time.