logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.07.24 2013고단666
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Coinado sports car.

On May 18, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:45 on May 18, 2013, and had the two-lane road in front of the private car 1388-7, a building-in-house 1388-7, a building-in-house 1388-7 proceed at the speed of 30 to 40 km from the front side of the street.

At the time of night, there was a crosswalk in which signal lights were not installed at the front of the night, and thus, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and checking whether there is a person driving a motor vehicle, etc., by safely driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and tried to find out the victim C (at least 48 years of age) who cross the crosswalk at the right-hand side due to the occupational negligence proceeding at the same speed as the front left-hand side and to avoid it. However, the Defendant failed to avoid it, and had the victim go beyond the ground by receiving a half of the right-hand edge of the victim's vehicle as the front-hand side of the driver's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a pelle part of the frame that requires approximately 13 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. On-site map and related photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is limited to the degree of injury of the victim due to the negligence of the defendant for the reason of sentencing, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

arrow