logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.07.10 2020가단1438
대여금(시효연장)
Text

1. The decision on the loan case between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2006Da142645, April 5, 2007) is rendered.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for a loan claim with Seoul East Eastern District Court 2006Gaso142645, and on April 5, 2007, the above court rendered a judgment that “the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff 6 million won with 5% interest per annum from December 31, 2005 to February 27, 2007, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment” (hereinafter “the preceding judgment”). The above preceding judgment was finalized on April 27, 2007.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff's assertion seeking confirmation of the existence of the lawsuit of this case for the interruption of extinctive prescription of the claim based on the prior judgment of this case is reasonable, and the benefit of confirmation is also recognized.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning.

arrow