logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.09.13 2018고단657
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant has been living in the monthly salary that the husband receives while working in another person's pharmacy after the husband has closed his business due to a side-off in 2000.

When the Defendant got guarantee from her husband's wife's husband's wife's wife's husband's debt incurred about KRW 67 million, and the Defendant could not have borrowed KRW 20 million to other her husband, the Defendant continued to make a false statement to the victim as her husband D opened and operated a pharmacy as her husband D opened and operated a pharmacy.

The defendant around January 2009 is not enough to pay the victim operating funds to operate his/her husband's pharmacy in Sungnam and to purchase drugs.

A pharmacy female employee received money from a bank to make a deposit.

The interest rate of 2.5% per month shall be paid and the principal shall be repaid.

D If a pharmacy operated by D is sold, premium of KRW 300 million may be collected.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, as stated above, the husband of the defendant did not operate the pharmacy, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on January 5, 2009, received KRW 15 million from the injured party as a loan from the injured party, from that time, from that time to August 26, 201, obtained the total of KRW 15 million through the same method, such as the list of crimes, from August 26, 201.

[Defendant and defense counsel asserts that the victim did not know that her husband had opened and operated a pharmacy, and that there was no deception.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant has the ability to repay since her husband operates her husband's pharmacy.

A statement made by the victim that he/she was accused is reasonable.

arrow