The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant divided his mistake, and that the defendant agreed with the victims.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case is not good, that the defendant committed again during the period of probation for the same kind of crime even though he had been tried at several times, the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of probation for the same crime, the balance of sentencing with the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.