logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.10.14 2015가단15078
임대차보증금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 20% from September 8, 2015 to September 30, 2015.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim: On May 16, 2013, the Plaintiff leased from the Defendant at KRW 40,000 for two years from June 30, 2013, the lease deposit was set as KRW 201 among the three-story housing and neighborhood living facilities, a reinforced concrete building 1-dong reinforced concrete structure C, a reinforced concrete slab 201, a Cheongju-si, a Cheongju-si, a substantial period of lease.

Although the lease term expires, the defendant did not refund the above lease deposit to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff was caused to bring an action in this case.

(F) The dismissed part shall be governed by statutory interest rate fluctuations under the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings)

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow