1. The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims against the conjunctive defendant are all dismissed.

2...

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is the non-corporate body that belongs to the E religious order, which is organized from among the churches with D religious faith in the Republic of Korea, and the defendant foundation is established with the contribution of the defendant church for the missionary work in Korea and abroad, and carries out projects such as the establishment and operation of the church, the acquisition and management of property, the selection and operation of missionary work officers, and the support of missionary work expenses.

B. The Plaintiff’s work experience 1) graduated from F Schools around February 1978, and thereafter, from April 1978 to February 1986, the Plaintiff had been in charge of the teaching Gu history as the Doner and pastors in the Defendant church from February 1986 to September 198, and had been in charge of the teaching Gu history from February 1986 to September 2, 1988 to the “H affiliated with the G religious organization located in the area of Louisiana State New Organization,” and had been in charge of the teachers’ activities as the calife. 2) after the Plaintiff from around 1989 to around 201.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for the return to the Defendant church on August 25, 2009, but the Defendant Foundation rejected the Plaintiff’s application for the return to the Defendant church on September 2, 2009. (2) The Plaintiff filed an application for the return to the Defendant church on February 2, 2011, but the Defendant Foundation rejected the Plaintiff’s application for the return to the Defendant church on February 10, 201.

On February 28, 2016, the defendant church dealing with the plaintiff as a retired teacher was registered as the plaintiff on the Internet homepage (J) of the defendant church as a retired teacher.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 5, Eul 2, 4 through 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The plaintiff's primary claim 1) The plaintiff is a regular passenger teacher who was regularly dispatched from the defendant foundation or the defendant church and was engaged in missionary activities in H. The plaintiff thereafter is a general religious order of the K General Assembly belonging to the defendant foundation (hereinafter "K General Assembly").