The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (2,500,000 won) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment shows the defendant's attitude of opposing his mistake, the fact that there was no history of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc., which can be considered for the defendant, or that the Nonghyup Bank account connected with the defendant's crow card was used for the fraudulent act at the Internet trading site and the amount of damage therefrom appears to be at least 2,520,00 won in total. The court below, taking into account the above circumstances, has already reduced the amount of fine more than the punishment of the summary order, and the defendant's age, sex, sex, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, family environment, motive and consequence of the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.