beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s claim is claiming a total of KRW 14,134,020, and damages for delay, on the ground that the Defendant suffered each of the following damages.
The Defendant, who worked as the elevator engineer of the Plaintiff Company on July 13, 2013, brought the freight vehicle B, which is the Plaintiff Company, to drive on July 14, 2013, and brought the automobile accident on July 14, 2013, which is the next day. As a result, the Defendant incurred the automobile accident from the Seocom Line’s car exemption amounting to 500,000 won, the premium increase amounting to 89,270 won, the insurance premium increaseing in 2014 (from April 23, 2014 to April 23, 2015), and 2015 (from April 23, 2015 to April 23, 2016).
B. On July 2013, the damage related to the construction was sustained by the Defendant’s failure to receive the total of KRW 12,000,000 from the intermediate payment and the remainder of the construction cost, which was paid by the Company D, as the result of the Defendant’s improper work while performing installation works for the elevators of the Company C.
C. Around August 2014, the Defendant suffered property damage that is imposed by KRW 80,000 of the traffic penalty due to being discovered as illegal parking while using a motor vehicle of the Plaintiff Company for its personal purpose.
Around September 2014, the Plaintiff paid the construction section to the Defendant. The Defendant incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 700,000,000 in value of the construction section due to the Plaintiff’s failure to return the construction section upon retirement of October 5, 2014.
E. On the end of January 2014, after purchasing Nowon-gu in which “Dongyang EK-50 program” was removed in KRW 700,000,00,000, and then paying to the Defendant who was permanently stationed in the department store E around October 5, 2014, the Defendant incurred property damage equivalent to KRW 700,000,000 on the wind of purchasing Nowon-do while withdrawing from the office around October 5, 2014.
2. The plaintiff's scope of adjudication in this Court against the defendant
(a) through (e);
The claim for damages relating to the facts of subsection.