1. On September 30, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition revoking the Plaintiff’s compensation benefits for pneumoconiosis survivors and funeral expenses.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 2, 2006, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) who was the spouse of the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “1/0”, “tbbbb”, and “F0” as a result of the precise diagnosis of pneumoconiosis conducted by D companies on March 2, 2006, and was determined as disability grade 13 grade 12. As a result of the precise diagnosis of pneumoconiosis on August 21, 2007, the deceased B (hereinafter “the deceased”) was diagnosed as “1/2”, “F2 (serious disability)”, and “as a result of the precise diagnosis of pneumoconiosis on November 11, 2008, it was determined as disability grade 3 Grade 4, and was hospitalized from around March 1, 2008 to around January 21, 2001 to around March 21, 2009, after being diagnosed as “a type of disease,” “complication evidence”, and received approval for medical treatment from around 1/2, 2001 to March 1, 2010109.

B. On January 4, 2016, at around 08:34, the Deceased: (a) 119 emergency squad called up after receiving the Plaintiff’s report, was in a state of death, and was sent to the E Hospital by the 119 emergency room.

C. The Plaintiff claimed the Defendant for payment of pneumoconiosis survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the deceased died due to pneumoconiosis and a merger. However, on September 30, 2016, the Defendant rejected the payment on the ground that the deceased’s death was unrelated to pneumoconiosis.

hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case"

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap Nos. 1, 3, and 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same applies)

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was hospitalized for a long period of time from November 2008 to the time of his/her death due to pneumoconiosis symptoms and pulmonary tuberculosis as a combined witness’s active pulmonary tuberculosis. In the process, the Plaintiff’s pulmonary tuberculosis was generated during the process. On November 3, 2015, the scarcity was generated on the deceased’s chest radiation observation against the deceased, and on January 4, 2016.