logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.09 2016나2066910
대여금 반환청구의 소
Text

1. Defendant B’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the lawsuit are assessed against Defendant B.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for adding the following judgments to the new arguments of the main defendant in the court of first instance under the fourth 5th eth of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The primary Defendant asserts to the effect that, “A” includes KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,00,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion.

The appeal by the primary defendant is dismissed for lack of reason.

arrow