Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant and B of the instant facts charged are between the workplace rent that had worked together at C points.
On July 29, 2019, at around 07:00, the Defendant was assaulted from the victim B (the age of 42) at the voice group D, and at the C office, the Defendant was assaulted by the victim (the age of 42). On the contrary, the Defendant her left hand, frighted with the victim's neck, her left hand, pushed the victim's bat with the victim's bat, pushed the victim's bat, pushed the victim's bat with his hand, pushed the victim's bat with his hand, and pushed the victim's sat.
2. According to the record, according to the judgment, the defendant's title was cut up several times at the time of B, the defendant's title was pushed up, the defendant's face was tightly taken, and the defendant's body was taken up several times at his own head.
Considering that B continued assaulted the Defendant as above, and during that process, the Defendant committed an act indicated in the facts charged against B, the Defendant appears to have committed an act indicated in the facts charged in order to continuously oppose B’s attack.
Therefore, the illegality of the defendant's act is excluded as self-defense or legitimate act.
The facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting the crime and thus, is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the
In addition, the summary of this decision is not disclosed in accordance with the proviso of Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act.