A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 25, 2015, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and KRW 2,00,000 as a fine in the above court on June 8, 2007.

1. Around 16:00 on April 23, 2016, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.209% from the 3km section from the Manyang-si to the front road of the Fanyang-dong in the same city-alley-dong.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) led the Defendant to snickly snick in a blood alcohol concentration of 0.209% on the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) and drive the above vehicle under the circumstances where it is difficult to drive normally, such as the snick distance on the left and right side of the pedestrian, and drive the said vehicle along a two-lane one way from the boundary of the Yellow Water Distribution Center to the luminous basin.

At the same time, the vehicle flow of a vehicle is the place where the flow of the vehicle is high, and the vehicle of the defendant was in progress at the front of the vehicle of the victim. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by securing the safety distance that can be avoided if the vehicle of the vehicle is able to reduce or stop speed, and operating the steering and operating the steering system accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as salt, tension, etc., of the Gyeong5 vehicle behind the above SM5 vehicle due to the occupational negligence of the Defendant, which was conducted while neglecting this, by taking up the part of the Defendant’s vehicle behind the above SM5 vehicle, and taking around two weeks of treatment to the victim.

As a result, the defendant was driving a motor vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, thereby causing the injury of people.

Summary of Evidence

1.