Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months and by a fine of 100,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 02:30 on December 23, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim by using her hand at “C” in Pyeongtaek-si B without any particular reason while drinking the victim D(40 years of age) and alcohol.

2. On December 23, 2018, at around 03:28, the Defendant, who violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, took a bath to “sprink, bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch”, and “Yhhhhhhhh” while drunking on the front of the F District located in Pyeongtaek-si E, and took a urine without permission at a place where many people gather or frequent.

3. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2018. 12. 23. 04:21경 위 F지구대 건물 안에서, 112 신고를 받고 출동하기 위해 위 지구대 사무실을 나가려던 경찰관 G(46세)에게 “이 씹할 놈아” 라고 욕을 하고, 경찰관의 왼쪽 허벅지를 피고인의 발로 찼다.

In the end, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on mobilization under 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of D and H;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of materials suspected of assault and obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 3(1)12 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of violence), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment of imprisonment, and the choice of fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and 3, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even though the defendant had been punished several times due to violent crimes, the crime of this case is not good in that he/she again commits the crime of this case, the defendant's mistake is divided, and it is not serious damage to the defendant thereafter.