A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site after receiving a report on domestic violence 112; (b) expressed a bath to “C 101 Dong 601; and (c) expressed the details of the report; and (d) assaulted Ebbucks on the first occasion; and (b) interfered with police officers’ legitimate performance of duties regarding the handling of reporting 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (on-site situations);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The criteria for sentencing for the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendations] The sentence shall be determined in full view of the following conditions of sentencing, including the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., as a whole, in the basic area (from June to June, 1), the sentence of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommendations] that interferes with the performance of official duties.

- The interference with the performance of official duties should be strictly punished for offenses that impair the function of the State by nullifying legitimate exercise of public authority, so that there is no criminal history exceeding the recognition and reflection of crimes, and fines.