logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.21 2016고단1814
사기
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The structure of the crime of the fraud of lending workers' deposit money, and the public offering to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, through financial institutions entrusted with the National Housing Fund business to stabilize the housing of homeless workers, operate the system of deposit money for workers deposit with the interest rate lower than that of the city without securing the deposit money for workers.

The loan hub, which consists of loan hubs, tenant recruitment measures, tenant recruitment measures, tenant recruitment measures, tenant recruitment measures, etc., takes advantage of the fact that the financial institution entrusted with the business related to the loan of the loan of the loan of the loan of the house can easily obtain the loan by submitting the related documents such as employment certificate, etc., and the contract documents such as real estate lease contract, etc., through formal examination. Under the order of the loan hub, the tenant recruitment measures made false documents such as the certificate of employment, salary statement, etc. under the name of a disguised company as if the borrower actually worked as an employee, and made false documents such as the tenant recruitment measures to recruit the tenant and the tenant's loan of the loan of the loan of the house of the house of the house of the lease of the lease of the house of the lease of the lease of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house of the lease of the lease of the lease of the house.

2. Defendant A is a false lessee, and Defendant B is a false lessor and it is difficult to lend a financial institution by normal means around February 2009.

arrow