Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 20, 2016, the Defendant received 800,000,000,000 won from the brogate of the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Apartment on September 20, 2016 from the brode by the complainant and the representative of the occupants. However, in order to announce and discuss the apartment management issues with the occupants, more than 300 occupants are gathered, and the complainant refers to the complainant with his/her hand and to the occupants, and the Defendant received money from the 800,000,000,000,000 won.
By speaking, “the reputation of the complainant was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each police statement made to E and F;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;
1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;
1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act on the confinement in a workhouse (when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked)
1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution appears to have been continued for a long period of time among the residents of the apartment of this case, and it appears that he left the phrase that he received money or goods from the EF before the crime of this case (in the case of witness I, he did not attend meetings at the J restaurant, but he did not say that he and the K paid money or goods to F E” from the Defendant and K.
Although the witness G did not memory anyone who was also the witness G, there was a little studio that the above remarks were delivered to E.
According to the witness K’s legal statement, the defendant, including the witness K, seems to have seen the above remarks, and there are circumstances that may be somewhat different from the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and other circumstances such as the age of the defendant).