The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, the lower court’s determination that the charges of this case were guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by infringing on the defendant’s right of defense

In addition, it is not a requisite attorney-at-law, but a national defense counsel should be appointed pursuant to Article 33 (3) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the court of this case did not appoint and give the defendant a national defense counsel.

In addition, the lower court did not err in violating the statutes relating to the selection of a national defense counsel in the litigation proceedings.

Other grounds for appeal shall not constitute legitimate grounds for appeal prescribed in Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.