Text
The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Judgment as to the primary cause of claim
A. 1) The status of the parties is a juristic person established to engage in real estate development business, real estate consulting business, authorization and permission agency business necessary for real estate development business, PE partnership business, and association general assembly agent business, etc., and the defendant is a regional housing association established to carry out regional housing business in the Dong-si C in Gangwon-do.
At the time of entering into the instant contracts Nos. 1 and 2, the head of the Defendant’s association was D and resigned from the extraordinary general meeting on February 11, 2019, and E was elected as the head of the newly established association.
2) On May 31, 2018, the term of the contract of KRW 130,000 (No. 1. 1: 130,000,000 (No. 1. 2): the service period: the Defendant’s administrative affairs related to the ordinary general meeting (no. 1: (i) the participation of the social members; (ii) the preparation and delivery of mail, return; (iii) the number of persons conducting the extraordinary general meeting, such as stenography, film, video, and security; (iv) the public participation in the general meeting, education and management; (v) the receipt and progress of the general meeting; and (v) the method of paying the service amount: (iv) the payment of the cash payment contract of KRW 40,00,000,000 at the general meeting; and (v) the value of KRW 90,000,000,000 after the opening of the general meeting: the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant and the Plaintiff through the following service contract of KRW 281 million (hereinafter referred to 2. 2.
C) On June 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a service contract with external business employees, including G, etc., and performed services under the instant contract, such as printing, sending, security and recording of books at the ordinary meeting, and as a result, the Defendant’s general meeting was held on June 24, 2018.
D) The Plaintiff and the Defendant were the date of the next Buddhist holiday.