Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Punishment of the crime

The victim F entered into a real estate lease agreement with the head of the said shopping mall management office I on June 2, 2010 with respect to the second floor of the “H shopping mall” located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and operated a middle school in the name of J. The Defendant A entered into a real estate lease agreement with Defendant B, the actual owner of the said shopping mall 201, 202, and 216, on March 1, 2011, and purchased the said part from Defendant C on September 9, 201.

The Defendants conspired to operate the said private teaching institute from around 13:00 on October 31, 201 to around 14:00 on the same day, and from around 16:16 on the basis of a lease agreement with I, the Defendants interfered with the operation of the victim’s private teaching institute by force on the grounds that F and I would refuse to enter into a new lease agreement with the Defendants who are the sectional owners of the ownership of 201, etc. and pay rent, on the ground that F and I would refuse to enter into a new lease agreement and pay rent.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness I and F;

1. The witness A’s partial statement (as to the defendant B)

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. A copy of the written agreement;

1. Proxy letter;

1. Documents of the decision on provisional disposition such as entry into and exit from buildings, etc., for the support of astronomical designs; and

1. A duplicate of the complaint (Action demanding confirmation of the lessee's status);

1. A real estate lease contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314(1) and Article 310 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the Defendants’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A and C

A. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendants brought to the educational corridor of the instant educational institute.