The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the statements in the summary of the grounds for appeal are consistent and reliable, the defendant should be deemed to have inflicted an injury on the victim B (hereinafter "victim"), as shown in the facts charged in this case, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and the court below found the defendant not guilty on the facts charged in this case based on the result of reproduction of the USB recording file which is likely to be fabricated by the defendant. Thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged against the Defendant is as follows: (a) around 15:30 on May 2, 2012, the Defendant was aware of the Defendant’s photographing a book installed in the stairs to report to an administrative agency by entering the Gccccception building located in the f2th floor in Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu, F. In order to report to the administrative agency; (b) the Defendant called the victim by telephone and waiting for the Defendant on the 112 and the f., who was going on the 14th floor; and (c) the Defendant immediately unloaded the stairs while the Defendant was waiting for the Defendant; and (d) the victim was able to display the f.e., the f., the Defendant’s chest f., who was able to put the f.b., the Defendant’s chest f., following the Defendant’s chest.

B. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, according to the result, etc. of reproducing the USB file, in which the Defendant recorded the situation at the time of the occurrence of the instant case from the court below, it is difficult to view that the victim’s investigative agency and the court below’s statement in relation to dialogue and behavior, etc., which had been entered between the Defendant and the victim at the time of the instant case, are credibility, and furthermore, the victim’s statement based on the victim’s statement