logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.06.28 2016고단403
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 2, “2016 Highest 403,” practically operated a company operating a favorable processing business in the name of “C” at the window B of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and the victim D served as the head of the above company.

The Defendant, around January 30, 2010, at the same place of business, may punish the victim as having the victim paid money with a favorable processing business in Vietnam.

B. It is not possible to get a loan from a bank or a lending company due to bad credit standing now.

In the name of the victim, a company is created in the name of the victim and a loan is made and the loan is made with a large amount of money to establish a favorable company in Vietnam.

The phrase “the victim was remitted KRW 39 million from the victim as the borrowed money on the same day.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was bad credit standing due to failure in multiple businesses, and the above workplace rental deposit was set off by the lessor due to the difficulties of the company from around 2009, and was requested by the lessor to leave. Since the Defendant was in arrears with the comprehensive income tax and value-added tax of KRW 10,000,000 imposed on the Defendant, the Defendant did not have the ability to repay the loan even if he borrowed money from the damaged party. The Vietnam glass Project also took the words of the defect of the business as the land manager and took out the business from the damaged party while there was no fund while there was no fund, it was thought that the business will be carried out by using money from the injured party, such as Vietnam business travel expenses, living expenses, etc., and it was thought that the business will not clearly ascertain the detailed feasibility of the business, such as the core machinery customs clearance and the procedure necessary for the business, and it was expected that the business will be carried out without establishing detailed business plan in Vietnam.

Therefore, even if you borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention to repay it.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow