1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 1, 2004, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status on December 18, 2015 while entering the Republic of Korea for technical training (D-3) and staying there.

B. On March 17, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be recognized “ sufficiently based fears that would be detrimental to persecution” stipulated as the requirements for refugee status under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On April 15, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on April 15, 2016, but rendered a final decision dismissing the Plaintiff’s application on December 22, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff is believed to be a Islamic bridge, and around 2006, at the time of visiting Pakistan, from 6 to 7 people in stropha to knife the knife, etc., and thereafter, the Plaintiff’s family continues being threatened by stropha, such as the Plaintiff’s knife’s knife and knife’s knife and knife.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case that did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though the possibility that the plaintiff might be stuffed due to the above circumstances is high in the case that the plaintiff returned to Pakistan.

B. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the above facts of recognition and the purport of the evidence No. 3 and the entire arguments, it is insufficient to deem that the Plaintiff has a well-founded fear of persecution, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

The defendant's disposition of this case is legitimate.

1. In a situation where it is difficult for the Plaintiff to find out the circumstances that the Plaintiff played a religious leading role as a Simpath forest.