1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. On April 23, 2010, 2010, C, the Plaintiff’s mother, refers to the Plaintiff’s agent, and a notary public, along with the Defendant, lent KRW 1.5 million to the obligor on April 23, 2010, and the obligor borrowed KRW 20,000 on April 23, 2010. In the event the obligor and the joint guarantor fail to perform their monetary obligations under this contract, the obligor was subject to compulsory execution, thereby recognizing that there is no objection. The obligee, the obligor, and the joint guarantor, as the obligee, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the joint guarantor, as the agent C, the No. 796 on April 23, 2010, and ② the obligee lent KRW 90,000 to the obligor, and the obligor borrowed the notarial deed on April 23, 2010, each of the above notarial deeds as the obligee, the obligor and the joint guarantor were not subject to compulsory execution.

B. Around July 2014, the Defendant filed an application against the Plaintiff for an explanation of property based on each of the instant notarial deeds.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 3, Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. Although the Plaintiff did not delegate the right to prepare each of the instant notarial deeds to the Plaintiff C, C was issued with the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate and seal imprint, and entrusted the Plaintiff with the preparation of each of the instant notarial deeds by forging delegations, each of the instant notarial deeds without any authority.