logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.05.29 2017고정1504
재물손괴등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Around 00:00 on September 2, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s flab that the Defendant, in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, resisted to walk the victim’s DNA car at the right side of the victim’s D, and followed up one-time to walk the pentar.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the fourth public trial date);

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Investigation report (investigation related to lawful acts);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for a crime: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional payment order: The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The Defendant: (a) around 00:00 on September 2, 2017, and around 00:0, the Defendant damaged the unpaid property of the repair cost, following the Defendant’s fall into the right side of the vehicle, on the ground that the E-friendly car operated by D was in front of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on his own in front of the bicycle.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant can be found to have the right side of the D's vehicle and walked one another.

그러나 ① 피고인이 자전거에 올라탄 상태에서 자전거 중심을 잡으면서 한쪽 발로 차량을 걷어찼기 때문에 그 가격의 강도가 그리 세지는 않았을 것으로 보이는 점, ② 블랙 박스 영상을 보면 피고인이 당시 흰색 운동화를 신었던 것으로 보이고, 그 신발의 밑창이 증거 목록 순번 13( 차량 손괴사진 )에 보이는 차량 팬 더 부분 흠집을 낼 정도로 딱딱하거나 날카롭다고

In light of the fact that there is no evidence to support that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the automobile of D was damaged by the defendant's act, and there is no other evidence to support it.

3. Accordingly, this part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow