A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2010, the Defendant sentenced four months to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Incheon District Court on February 18, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on February 24, 2010 during the period of detention.

1. On October 19, 201, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the victim’s E-stock company office operated by the victim C in Gyeyang-gu, Young-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul, that “The victim would have a large number of certified public appraisers in Korea and have some middles. It would allow the victim to receive an appraisal report with a higher amount than nine billion won in actual appraisal as to the amount of KRW 2700,000,000, including the Government-si in the Jeju-si, the Government-si, and the amount of KRW 20,000,000.”

However, the facts are that there was no appraiser known to the defendant, and there was no appraiser who can exert the G influence on the middle, and that G or the defendant did not have any way to get a higher appraisal than the actual value. Therefore, even if the defendant received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to have a higher appraisal desired by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as such, and obtained 3 million won from the victim for expenses around that time, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On October 30, 201, the Defendant against the victim H made a false statement to the victim H on a restaurant where it is difficult to know the trade name in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on October 30, 201, stating, “The Chairperson who knows that there are many certified public appraisers in the city and the Chairperson who knows that there is a small scale of appraisal corporation, which is well known to the Appraisal Association, shall have the competent appraisal corporation in mind. The cost of KRW 150 million enters the port and the starting amount of KRW 40 million,00,000,000,000,000 won, which is higher than the actual appraisal, shall be ordered to have the victim H undergo an appraisal report with a higher price than 45,00,000 won.”

However, the fact was that there was no appraiser known to the defendant, as well as Gging that he had no influence on the appraisal corporation, etc., and the above GB.