1. The defendant shall enter each of the final shares in the attached inheritance share sheet in the attached Form, among the 83m2 in Silung-si L-si's 83m2, respectively.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be recognized in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including each number), which is significant in this court, or which is admitted in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings.

During the Japanese occupation period, the land investigation department prepared by the Joseon General Dok-General Land Survey Authority in the Japanese occupation period is stated as being subject to the assessment of M, the address of which is a disturbance.

On the other hand, according to Article 31 and Article 31 and 4 and Article 31 and subparagraph 2 of the Regulations of the Investigation Bureau of the Provisional Land Survey Bureau of the Joseon General, which was enacted by the Directive No. 33 on June 7, 1913, the land survey division is required to omit the address in the preparation of the land survey division where the address and the location of the land are identical.

B. The above land became the land indicated in paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter “instant land”) due to the change of its land category and administrative district, and the conversion of its area into the land size.

C. The instant land is registered as being owned on November 20, 1910 by M and Changchip N, the address of which is a blank column in the former land cadastre.

The plaintiffs' prior net M is the O of the Seocheon-gun of Gyeonggi-do, and creative name N.

E. The above net M died on August 25, 1943, and his South-North net P had already died on April 3, 1921.

In addition, on October 25, 1982, the net Q died after the wife R and children already died, after having been married to the Defendant F, married to the Plaintiff F, married to the Plaintiff G, South Korea Plaintiff H, and Samnam net. On October 14, 1978, the network Q died after having left the Plaintiff C, the Plaintiff C, the Plaintiff D, and the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff C, the Plaintiff C, the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff C, the Nonparty C, who were divorced at the time of October 25, 1982.

On the other hand, the deceased on March 30, 1990, and the deceased on December 18, 201, the deceased on the part of the Plaintiff J and K.

2. The plaintiffs' judgment as to the defense of this case against the defendant is against the plaintiffs' prior owner M.