All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. As to the sentencing of the first instance court (one year of imprisonment, six months of imprisonment) against the Defendants in the summary of the grounds for appeal, the prosecutor appealed on the grounds that the Defendants are too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine both the judgment prosecutor and the Defendants’ assertion of unreasonable sentencing.

In full view of the circumstances leading up to the instant case, the seriousness and degree of the commission of the crime, the amount of benefits, the confession of the Defendants and their mistakes are often divided, the cooperation in the investigation was made, and other various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and criminal record, the sentencing of the first instance court against the Defendants is deemed to be adequate, too weak, or unreasonable. Therefore, the argument of unfair sentencing by the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by both the Defendants and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.