logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.11 2017고단3913
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2017, the Defendant damaged the property that the victim E (27 tax) who is an employee of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at the main point of "D" located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul around December 15:27, 2017, left the bend part of the rest part of the rest part of the toilet in the main point and managed by the victim of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The circumstances favorable to the defendant who committed the instant crime even though he/she was punished several times for the same kind of crime: The victim E expressed his/her intent that he/she does not want to be punished against the defendant during the period of suspension of execution, and the extent of damage to property. The part dismissing the public prosecution taking into account all the various circumstances that form the sentencing conditions specified in the instant pleadings, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, career, home environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime;

1. On December 8, 2017, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul around December 15:27, 2017, assaulted the victim E at five times, by hand, on the ground that the victim E continues to grow.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (1) and (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the injured person expressed his intention not to punish the accused.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow