logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.12 2017고합84
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 29, 2016, the Defendant, at around 13:30 on December 29, 2016, paid 180,000 won for sexual traffic to F, even though he knows that the “E” was a child or juvenile, through smartphone display c, within the “Del” c, Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. In addition, the Defendant paid 180,000 won for sexual traffic to F.

As a result, the defendant was committing the act of purchasing child or juvenile sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police witness (a copy) with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to the verification of CCTV images recorded in a sexual traffic place) (referring to the submission of a detailed statement using a suspect A card);

1. Article 13 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which applies to the relevant criminal facts and the selective punishment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances shall be considered for the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Fines of not less than 10 million won but not more than 25 million won;

2. Non-application of the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply as the person selects a fine; and

3. Determination of sentence: The crime of this case, which is a fine of 10 million won, purchases the sex of a child or juvenile who is an adult, and such a crime is likely to be criticized in that it not only infringes on the human rights of the child or juvenile concerned but also has a serious adverse effect on the settlement of the correct and sound sex culture in our society.

However, all the defendants have led to confession and reflect on the crime of this case, and have no record of being punished for the same crime.

In addition, the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are committed.

arrow