logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.01.25 2017가단70508
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B, D, and the Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association jointly with the Plaintiff at KRW 85,00,000,000 and the Plaintiff on May 8, 2017.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, around June 2012, entered into a sublease contract with Defendant C to “Seoul Mapo-gu F Building 1115,” and paid KRW 100 million to the said real estate.

Upon the introduction of Defendant C, the Plaintiff examined the “Seoul Mapo-gu Htel 1546 and 1547” (hereinafter “instant real estate”) managed by the “Seoul Mapo-gu Htel 1546 and 1547” (hereinafter “instant real estate”). On April 9, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the instant company that represented the owner of the instant real estate by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 100 million and the lease term of KRW 24 months from April 12, 2015 to April 12, 2017.

At the time, Defendant D, a licensed real estate agent, prepared a lease agreement, and issued a certificate of credit (credit number: I) issued by Defendant D Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) to the Plaintiff.

In order to pay the deposit under the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff requested Defendant C to return the sublease deposit under the previous sub-lease contract, and the Defendant C transferred KRW 100 million to Defendant B’s account in the name of Defendant B (Korean Bank J and Deposit Shares B) on August 13, 2015, according to the direction of Defendant B.

On April 13, 2015, the Plaintiff completed the resident registration of the instant real estate and obtained a fixed date.

However, the instant company and Defendant B merely leased the instant real estate from the owner until June 26, 2015, and did not obtain delegation or consent from the sub-lease, and the Plaintiff did not receive a refund of the lease deposit from the instant company and Defendant B even after the period of the instant lease agreement expires.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. (1) According to the above facts, Defendant B is liable for damages.

arrow