beta
Text
1. Determination of a site level for new employment promotion incentives related to B, C, and D as of May 4, 2010 against the Plaintiff, and determination of a site level for the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a corporation that has been engaged in the business of manufacturing newspaper sites from May 2009.
B. Around October 1, 2009, the Plaintiff submitted an application to the Defendant for the utilization of professional human resources in the quarter of 2009, Article 20 of the former Employment Insurance Act (amended by Act No. 10337, May 31, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply), Article 16 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 22026, Feb. 8, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Article 19 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Labor No. 338, Feb. 9, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply). Around September 7, 2009, the Plaintiff entered the total amount of G workers (a person who was engaged in management planning at least 300 full-time workers in a class of position with a position equivalent to or more than three years, and entered the total amount of wages paid to G workers at KRW 1,600, 2009.
In addition, around October 13, 2009, the Plaintiff submitted a certificate of benefit receipt to the effect that the Defendant public official H’s public official received KRW 1,274,240 from September 30, 2009, which was written by the worker G at the time of his business trip and investigation in order to verify the eligibility of the Plaintiff’s work site for the use of the above professional manpower.
Accordingly, the defendant around October 19, 2009: 960,000 won [the monthly wage of KRW 1,200,000 (Provided, That the monthly wage of KRW 3/4 is limited to the monthly wage of KRW 1,200,000 x 24/30, hereinafter referred to as "the issue incentive of this case") to the plaintiff.
A. The payment was made.
C. The Plaintiff: (a) around January 2, 2010, to the Defendant for the period from October 2009 to December 2009, with respect to G workers, the Plaintiff’s incentive for the use of specialized human resources for small and medium enterprises, and against B of workers.