The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the victim and his family members are protruding and protruding the defendant, and the defendant was pushed down with the victim as well as his family members, so there is no fact that the victim was injured.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① the victim, E, and F consistently stated that “at the time, the Defendant was strongly tightly populated with the victim’s reputation by hand,” and ② G, a apartment management complaint, was in dispute as to the noise problem between the floor at the time, and why the victim was harming the Defendant.

(3) In full view of the fact that the victim was diagnosed by Defendant I on the day of the instant case, and was diagnosed by Defendant I on the chest’s wall, the part of the chest’s wall, and the part of the clothes that require three weeks’ treatment, etc., the victim may sufficiently recognize that the victim suffered the injury due to Defendant I’s assault.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no error of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles as alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.