logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.06.30 2015나38136
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasons for a member’s explanation on the instant case are as follows: (a) the statement of evidence No. 7 is consistent with the fact that the Defendant refused to cooperate in the debt acquisition procedure; (b) the statement of evidence No. 8 and No. 9 is insufficient to reverse the conclusion of the debt acquisition agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant as evidence; and (c) the statement of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the statement of the reasoning of the judgment, except for addition of the statement of evidence No. 8

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow