All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a beneficiary and the Defendant is a corporation that operates the Internet news website (E) with D companies that broadcast the general channel C press.

B. The Plaintiff’s criminal case first instance court and the appellate court’s result 1) The Plaintiff established a Kameras to photograph female players’ body in the Famerasia in the Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and installed an USB Kameras under the body of clothes or chairss three times in February through May 2013, and changed the 17th judgment of the lower court as to the crime of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Fameras photographing), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence), violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Joint Residence), and violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Joint Residence) (No. 2017) (No. 201) to the Plaintiff on the ground that there was no consistency in the judgment of the lower court with regard to the aforementioned crime of G21 and the 27th judgment on the ground that there was no consistency in the 197th judgment on the charges.

The above court held that the G’s statement that committed the crime with the Plaintiff was reversed several times as to the time of the crime, and there is no probative value which makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged, such as failing to specifically explain the method of sharing roles.