Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On June 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch branch branch branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 14, 2017.

[2] On September 28, 2016, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against Suwon District Court No. 404, Ansan District Court No. 404, Jun. 28, 2016, which is located in Ansan-si, U.S. 73 with a view to the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. against Suwon 720, J. 720, J. 720, and sold 20,000 won to C along with D., however, the Defendant was not aware of (i) the year, month, date, and time of sale, and (ii) how Defendant C made a statement at the time of sale at the time of the informant’s statement, and (iii) the fact that Defendant C is currently under the suspension of execution.

“The testimony was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant was aware of the fact that the time when he sold philophones to C was about April 2015 and the fact that C was about April 2015 when he made a statement by the informant and the defendant's memory.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the defendant or D by the prosecution;

1. Protocol of examination of witness (D);

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (A);

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect with regard to C;

1. Each police statement made against the defendant or D;

1. Recording recording, recording, recording, recording, or recording A;

1. A report on investigation (attaching the text of the judgment);

1. Previous offense: Criminal history data inquiry (A) and sentence of the judgment, etc. [Defendant and defense counsel shall make a statement as stated in the judgment that, at the time of his/her testimony, he/she was unable to memory the fact that the time when he/she actually sold philophones and the informants made a statement on April 2015, and that he/she did not make a false statement contrary to memory;

The argument is asserted.

However, the evidence, in particular, the defendant, and D in the ruling.