logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.05.15 2013노915
사기
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

An application filed by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The summary of the grounds for appeal is recognized inasmuch as the Defendants received money from the victim even though they did not have the intent or ability to repay the money even if they borrowed money from the victim.

However, since the court below acquitted the facts charged of this case, there is an error of misconception of facts.

B. (1) Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, the lower court’s determination of not guilty of the facts charged is justifiable, and it is difficult to deem that there was an

(2) The court below examined the following facts: (a) The Defendants Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company and Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company Company.

The victim recognized that the police had received an objection to the money stated in the facts charged of this case, but the prosecutor changed the statement to the name of the principal and interest of card loans. On the fourth trial of the trial of the party at the trial of the first instance, 80,000 won per month as to the money that the defendants lent until December 31, 2009.

arrow