logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.18 2014가단5336917
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. The Suwon District Court’s 202m2 per 380m2 and the 202m2m2 per Dongcheon-si, Dongcheon-si.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. According to the Forest Survey Report drawn up during the Japanese occupation occupation period, Gyeonggi-do E-gun E-gun 3 forest land of 8 YY 2 YE (hereinafter “instant assessment land”) is registered as owner by F.

B. Part of the land partitioned from the land of this case was the name of the administrative district, land category change, registration conversion, and area-unit conversion procedure in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, B, B, 380 square meters, C, 202 square meters prior to C, and D road 92 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land 1, 2, and 3”; and the said three land was added to each of the instant land.

C. As to the land of this case 1, 2, the defendant completed each registration of ownership preservation as Suwon District Court No. 5387, Feb. 21, 1997, and as to the land of this case 3, Suwon District Court No. 35765, Dec. 31, 1996.

The plaintiff is one of the co-inheritors of G (G and permanent domicile: Gyeonggi-si H).

[Ground] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-6 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. (1) The determination on the cause of the claim is based on the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the evidence incurred prior to whether the title holder and the plaintiff's prior consideration is the same person, the results of the fact inquiry about the Chapter I, and the overall purport of the arguments, and the names of F and the plaintiff's prior G are identical to the former, and the address of the situation holder F and the legal domicile of the plaintiff's prior G are equal to the latter two units of J in e-si, e-si, e-si, e-si, and the legal domicile of the plaintiff's prior consideration. In light of the above circumstances,

(2) In the absence of counter-proofs such as the change of the situation by the ruling, the person registered as the owner in the land survey division or the forest survey division of the defendant's duty to register cancellation shall be presumed to have been determined as the owner of the land. The person who received the assessment of the land shall be naturally acquired the land, and registration of preservation of ownership of the land shall be

arrow